Matthew 22:1-14; 10-12-14
Is
there any parable more troubling than the one we just heard? I’m not sure there
is. When I look at this parable, I know my mind just starts racing, and I am
tempted to begin making excuses for the king. Because on the surface, with our
21st century ears and context, the events depicted in this parable
are appalling. However, as is usually the case in the stories that Jesus
addresses to the leadership of the temple, there is a great deal below the surface of any parable.
The
details would have been appropriate and better understood by those for whom the
gospel was being written. That being said, this living word of God still carries with it the meaning for us today. So,
let’s dig under the surface together and discover applications of this gospel
text to our lives of faith.
So
let’s start by considering three questions:
1.
What is the most elegant (or expensive) dinner or party you have ever been
invited to?
2.
What is the most fun you have had at a wedding or other party to which you have
been invited?
3. What is the lamest excuse you have
ever used yourself, or heard someone else give, in order to get out of doing
something – like accepting an invitation?
Today’s
gospel text begins with preparations for a grand wedding banquet, a feast that
would, in those days have played out
over an entire week –compare this to
the recent wedding activities of George and Amal Clooney, which reportedly cost
well over one million dollars, to which only a few of the most connected people were invited. This included activities,
outings and parties that went on for days. Only in our reading of this wedding feast described in our
gospel, it is the king’s own son for
whom the wedding feast is being held.
Invitations
are sent out, but unbelievably, the intended guests all find something better
to do – that is hard to understand, given that fact that in this context, an invitation by the king is tantamount to
a command to appear and partake in
this celebration. Those who received that invitation by all rights would have
a) felt privileged to be included, and b) known
that their participation in this feast was essential to their political
welfare; it was an opportunity to show the king appropriate honor, and
allegiance to the legitimate successor to the throne.
Indeed,
political alliances are at stake.
Your life and well-being are at
stake. Refusal to come for any reason
short of a death in the family or some other tragedy would have been interpreted not only as an insult – but as
an act of rebellion – as a deliberate
act of defiance and contempt for the king’s authority - not a good move in anyone’s book of etiquette or survival manual.
In light of this fact the excuses of all the invitees were pretty lame indeed. They probably trump the lamest of excuses you
might have recalled.
Instead,
they defy the king, and refuse to come. However, the king persists in his desire to include all
these fine folk in the feast of the bridegroom, and sends another set of slaves out to issue the invitations. Maybe he
thought the first set of slaves were just inept at their job, gave the wrong
message or got lost, so he sends this second set out with more explicit directions to instruct the
people to come now that everything is ready and waiting for the party to begin.
It
is in horror, then, that we consider
what happens to those poor, wretched slaves when they deliver this invitation.
The response from the invitees can be seen as nothing less than a deliberate
act of insurrection. The king, appropriately, responds as any king would, to put down this rebellion and destroy those who initiated it.
Following
this interlude of violence, death and mayhem, the invitation is opened up to include
everyone else. And they come: the
good and the bad, the wealthy and the poor, the Gentiles and Jews, the women
and men, the business owners and the farmers, the sheep and the goats.
And, just when we heave a big sigh
because all seems, at last to be well, the king spots this one man who has the audacity
to upset the apple cart and wear the wrong
clothes to party. Now, at this point we might scratch our heads and say to
ourselves, “Really? What was he thinking?!
And the king’s response to this man’s faux pas? We are again shocked and horrified,
as this man is tossed out to a place where he will endure great suffering – we’re
confused because isn’t this a parable about the kingdom of God? Isn’t Jesus telling those around him this story to prepare them for the
Lord’s coming? And don’t we hear from our scriptures that God is patient, full
of grace and mercy and abounding in steadfast love?
So
how do we interpret this parable?
Today’s
gospel is about invitations, feasts, and the appropriate response to
magnificent, lavish grace. Like other parables, this story uses hyperbole, allegory
– and metaphor. Most of us will recognize the king as God, and the son for whom
this feast is given as Jesus.
The
marriage feast represents the great marriage feast of the Lamb. The slaves who
are sent, are the prophets; those whom God sent to invite the wayward people of
Israel to repent, to prepare the way for the Messiah, and finally, to believe.
Those initially invited, are God’s chosen people – the Israelites. The violence
represents Israel’s rejection of the prophets, up to and including John the
Baptist.
The
destroyed city may be seen as the fall of the temple and its destruction which,
for Matthew’s original audience, is an event which stands out in collective
experience and memory. Finally, the clothing that is worn by all who accept
this invitation may be understood as metaphor for the baptismal garment of
Christ.
So,
if you received this invitation, from the king no less, wouldn’t you be
honored? Wouldn’t you be exponentially more
honored than you were by the invitation to the event you wrote down in our
exercise a little earlier?
So
we have to wonder at the refusal of the original honored invitees; where is
their awe? Where is their sense of wonder?
Where is their gratitude for the grace and generosity of the king? Where is
their party-spirit?
Those
responses come from the ones who DO accept the invitation – the misfits; the
marginalized; those whose only real value comes from that fact that they were
invited at all, regardless of the circumstances. It is the king’s invitation that grants them status – they have none on their
own. Finally, the hall is filled with a mix of people glad to be fed and served
at the behest of the king. They show
up ready to party.
Clothes say a lot
about a person, especially in the tradition of first century Palestine. For an
important event, especially something like a wedding feast, or an appearance
with the king, one would wear his or her best. Anything less would be an
insult.
So
important was it to honor the host of something like a wedding, especially when
the host is king, that wedding garments might have been provided by the host. If
the garments were provided, not only would everyone be suitably attired, but
individual class and station would be indistinguishable. The clothing offered
would be, as the feast was, equally generous to all. So it is with the mystical
garment which clothes us from the moment of our baptism, mercifully prepared by
our Lord.
This
garment, supplied by our most gracious Lord of all, is no ordinary garment. It
is the righteousness that comes from God and it becomes for us the outward
expression of the inward change God performs in us through our baptism. It is
comprised of threads of compassion, generosity, kindness, and forgiveness. The
fabric of this garment is knit with concern for social justice, care for the
poor and marginalized. The golden thread that holds together the seams of this
garment was spun from the blood of our Savior, Jesus Christ, and it compels us, to welcome others to the
feast. It compels us to be not only
guests, but servants.
This
garment that clothes us so righteously reminds us that in the eyes of God,
whether we came from the stock of the good or the bad, beggar or prince, sheep
or goat, we are forever transformed by
God’s grace, united with Jesus Christ and with one another. Those of us who
wear this garment will be forever equal to all other garment-wearers, with no
distinction between race or class or gender, for the righteousness which comes
from our Lord, Jesus Christ knows no distinction, and becomes our salvation.
About the garment and the rogue
guest, Robert Capon writes that the Great Banquet has been made possible,
indeed it is ushered in by the death and resurrection of Jesus, and by that
alone.
Capon writes, “one person apparently
thought the banquet is based in something other than that. He wears some
other garment. We are not told whether the man wore rags or a tux.
It matters not which. Anything other than the wedding garment of Christ's
death and resurrection is irrelevant. The man is asked how he got in
without the proper dress. The man was "speechless." In
essence, by refusing to respond or speak, the man refuses to enter into a
relationship with the king….. if he'd said anything at all--if he would have
acknowledged a relationship in any way--he'd have been all right. But he
didn't. He was "speechless."”
The man is unceremoniously shown the
exit because the death and resurrection of Jesus is the only reason
that anyone is there. Their presence has nothing to do
with their "goodness" or "badness." It has nothing to
do with whether or not they are in any way "worthy." It has everything to do with a "new
creation" in which none of that counts.
Sooner
or later that grandest, most elegant party we listed earlier will end. But for
those who have accepted the invitation of our heavenly king, the feast has only
just begun. We must do more than just show up when we accept this gracious,
unmerited invitation. Like all those clothed in the baptismal garment bestowed
by God, we must allow ourselves to be forever transformed by the life-giving
feast of Christ. May it be so.
No comments:
Post a Comment